Dear Mr Byers

Dear Mr Byers
This is what we expect from those who are paid to represent us, and this is what I expected from my Member of Parliament, who is duty bound to help in any way that he can.

Below this email there is a document reproduced and in an attachment to this email written by Senator Stuart Syvret from Jersey. On how one should approach situations such as the one that presents itself to you sir.

I have gained a greater insight into the goings on in Jersey and how remarkably similar these cases are to that of Medomsley, Witherwack House and the Bryn Alyn and the St Vincent ' s St Aidan’s cases and how they were comprehensively glossed over.

I telephoned Mr Terry Hammond today to explain my last email to you and to apologise for my being angry at you for not really trying your hardest to bring these matters to the attention of the Home Secretary’s that have been in the post over the past 6 years.

As far as I am aware, you have not actually spoken to any of them on my behalf. You spoke to the minister in charge of the justice department. Mr Gerry Sutcliffe. I.e.

The very same people we are in litigation with?

I made mention of Members of parliament who have also done nothing for the victims they are meant to represent: MP for Widnes Derek Twigg who has done and said nothing, Malcolm Wicks who is at odds with the Law Lords as he said “I agree with the statutes on limitations the way they are and do and feels he can support his constituent member in this.

Hugh Bailey, York Council Labour Leader, who has done the minimum to support his constituent who I believe also, took over from one Rod Hills who had been remanded in custody then appearing at York Crown Court on charges of blackmail, perverting the course of justice, witness intimidation, wasting police time, soliciting women for prostitution, and dangerous driving. That’s some calibre is it not?

Of course they won’t have a public inquiry!!! The actual factual may get out into the public domain perish the thought.

Are these not the very people who are allowing this to travesty of justice to continue?

Or, are these people seen as the other side, the opposition in our case?

Can it be right that the Home Office can be the soul arbiter on judgement when it comes to people suing them?

Then to be ignored for decades, disbelieved for further decades, eventually going through appearances in court cases, confronting their tormentor face to face, given testimony of unspeakable events of their lives to an open courtroom.

To top it off! The Home Office, who are meant to stand for justice and integrity in this country, act in such a way as to tell the victims of sexual abuse at the hand of their staff and employee’s.

That they had every intention of dragging these sad sorry individuals through years of further litigation after having been through some of the worst cases of sexual torture a person could go through. (And Mr. Hammond was angry with me?)

I found his tone somewhat intimidating at first as he appeared to be shouting at me for some reason. He went on to say; “Your phone may be to load.” Which in my opinion he was wrong as my wife who sat beside me will tell you when I turned the phone onto external speaker he said “What do you expect from your MP.”

I will not be made to feel that way again! I have felt much the same way when my captor and abuser shouted at me. For the sake of getting my message across to Mr Terry Hammond, without having to resort to shouting at him and being cut off, thus failing to get my point across to him. I attempted to calm the situation by saying “I’m not shouting at you.”

As you and Terry Hammond know only to well I have tried for many years to get across our expectations from all MP’s not just yourself.

An MP’s Honesty, Integrity and an unswerving loyalty to the people who put them in their current position of that trust and power. Tell me am I wrong in my expectations of Members of Parliament? Isn’t the House Called the Houses of Commons? Was this not called that for the very purpose of dealing with the grievances of the common man?

This to date has not happened for any of the 22 common men involved in this case and in many other documented cases like this one. And you don’t win votes by shouting at people.

Enough is enough Mr. Byers surely you can empathise with the position all of these victims of state sexual abuse or do I have that wrong also?

I expect you with your honesty, integrity and unswerving loyalty to your people, to do the right thing and not stop asking for this public inquiry. I didn’t expect that you would just mention it twice then move on, with no follow up.

It is certainly not something one would expect their Member of Parliament to have difficulty with, however, once again! One only has to look at Jersey, Islington and Margaret Hodge to see examples of how not to behave.

I made mention of getting in touch with the BNP and believe me it’s been a long, long road to get here and with virtually no help from any agency apart from one person who works voluntarily for victim support it is likely I would never have felt able to go to court.

But to be honest with you I am at my wits end and finally I resort to seeking another way as the legitimate ways are being ignored, put to one side or purposely trampled on by the very people who were saying: “Tough on crime tough on the causes of crime.”

We were conned into going to court to make the police and cps look good, We foolishly though at last we would be believed, get justice, in full, and finally closure.

Where is it? We want to know!!!